The Power of Scale: How Economies of Scale Create the Real Advantages of Franchising

What can thousands of small business owners do together that one small business owner may struggle to do alone?

They can negotiate like a much bigger company.

In the first article in my Power of Organized series, I explored an idea that sits at the heart of franchising: organization can create economic leverage. An individual entrepreneur remains an independent business owner, but becoming part of a larger franchise system can provide access to resources, knowledge and infrastructure that would be difficult or expensive to create independently.

Economists have a term for some of the advantages that can result when an organization grows and is able to spread costs, purchasing, resources or infrastructure across a larger operation: economies of scale.

In franchising, those economies of scale can show up in very practical ways. Purchasing power is one of the easiest to see, and the home services sector provides an interesting real world example.

What Are Economies of Scale in Franchising?

Every business buys things. Depending on the industry, those purchases might include equipment, vehicles, supplies, insurance, technology, uniforms, marketing services or dozens of other products and services necessary to operate.

An independent business owner negotiates those relationships based largely on the purchasing volume of that individual company. A franchise organization, however, may represent hundreds or thousands of locally owned businesses purchasing many of the same products and services. That collective demand can change the conversation with vendors.

Greater purchasing volume can potentially create greater negotiating leverage, allowing a franchise organization to seek pricing, rebates or other terms that an individual small business may have difficulty obtaining independently.

But economies of scale in franchising can extend beyond purchasing. Shared marketing, technology, training, research, operating systems and specialized expertise can also allow costs and resources to be spread across a much larger network.

That is where the concept becomes particularly interesting for someone considering franchise ownership.

Franchise Purchasing Power in Action: Neighborly’s ProTradeNet

Neighborly provides a useful real world example. The company operates a large network of home service franchise brands across North America, including concepts in plumbing, electrical, handyman, painting, restoration and other residential services.

One of the resources available to Neighborly brand franchise owners is ProTradeNet, a vendor relations and supply chain program that uses purchasing activity across the network to negotiate preferred pricing and rebates with participating vendors.

Neighborly reports that franchise owners participating in ProTradeNet collectively received more than $8.7 million in rebate checks in 2023, along with $98 million in systemwide upfront savings.

Those numbers make an otherwise abstract economic concept very tangible. A single locally owned service business approaching a national vendor represents the purchasing activity of that individual company. Thousands of businesses purchasing similar products and services collectively represent something very different.

The businesses remain locally owned, but their connection to a larger organization may give them access to economic leverage they would have difficulty creating individually.

The Advantages of Franchising to the Franchisee Go Beyond Purchasing

Purchasing is one of the easiest advantages of scale to quantify, but it isn’t the only area where the size of a franchise network may matter.

A large franchise organization may be able to invest in technology, marketing infrastructure, training, research, operational systems and professional expertise at a level that would be expensive for one small business to replicate independently. The cost, knowledge and experience required to develop those resources can potentially be spread across a much larger network.

Consider technology. An independent entrepreneur can purchase scheduling software, develop a website, establish digital marketing programs, create customer relationship systems and build operating processes. None of those things are exclusive to franchising.

The difference is that the independent owner must identify, purchase, develop, integrate and often learn those resources independently. A franchise organization may already have invested in some of that infrastructure and can spread its development and use across many locations.

The same principle can apply to marketing. A single business has the marketing resources of that business. A franchise system may be able to combine resources across many locations to support broader advertising, digital platforms, creative development and brand awareness.

These are different expressions of the same underlying economic principle: scale can create access to resources that would be more expensive or difficult to build alone.

What Are You Actually Getting for Your Franchise Fees?

This is where I think the conversation about franchise fees sometimes becomes too narrow.

Prospective owners understandably look closely at the initial franchise fee, royalties, marketing fees and other ongoing costs. They should. Those expenses directly affect the economics of the business.

But looking only at what leaves the franchisee’s bank account tells only half the story. The other question is what the owner receives in exchange for those fees.

What would it cost to independently develop the technology the franchise provides? What would comparable marketing resources cost? Could an independent owner negotiate the same vendor pricing? How much time and experimentation would be required to create the operating processes, training and infrastructure independently?

The question isn’t simply, “What am I paying the franchisor?” It is also, “What would it cost me in money, time, expertise and experimentation to create these capabilities myself?”

That is a much more useful way to evaluate the economics of a franchise system.

Bigger Doesn’t Automatically Mean Better

There is an important caveat to all of this: scale only creates value for a franchisee when the benefits of that scale actually reach the franchisee.

A large franchise organization may have considerable purchasing volume, sophisticated technology or substantial marketing resources, but prospective owners still need to determine whether those advantages improve the economics or operation of their individual businesses.

That is where franchise due diligence becomes essential. Candidates should ask how purchasing programs work, which vendors participate, whether participation is required, how rebates are distributed and whether franchisees believe negotiated pricing is actually competitive. The same scrutiny should apply to technology, marketing programs, lead generation, training and other resources promoted as benefits of the larger system.

The existence of resources isn’t enough. The real question is whether those resources create meaningful value for the individual owner.

What Should a Prospective Franchise Owner Ask About Scale?

When evaluating a franchise opportunity, consider both sides of the economic equation. What does participation in the system cost, and what economic advantages does the system provide in return?

Does the network create meaningful purchasing advantages? Consider whether shared technology makes the operation more efficient and whether national or regional marketing improves local visibility. Look at the vendor relationships, knowledge and experience available through the network. Most importantly, ask whether the system provides capabilities that would require significant time or capital to build independently.

These questions move franchise evaluation beyond the logo and into the economics of the business system itself.

They also provide something more useful than simply asking whether a franchise is “good.” A franchise may offer significant resources that are extremely valuable to one entrepreneur and less important to another. Understanding which forms of leverage matter to you is part of determining whether a particular franchise system fits your goals, skills and expectations.

The Power of Scale Is Really the Power of Leverage

The lesson from Neighborly isn’t that every entrepreneur should own a Neighborly franchise, nor is it that the largest franchise organization is automatically the best one. Its purchasing program simply gives us a concrete way to see the economics of organization at work.

Thousands of individually owned businesses can remain local businesses while collectively possessing negotiating power that would be difficult for those businesses to create individually. Purchasing power is one visible example, while shared technology, marketing, infrastructure and expertise can be others.

That brings us back to the larger principle behind this series: economic power can increase when people and resources are effectively organized.

For a prospective franchise owner, that creates a valuable question to carry into every franchise conversation: What can I accomplish as part of this system that would be difficult, expensive or time consuming for me to accomplish alone?

The answer can tell you a great deal about what you’re actually paying for when you buy a franchise.

Finding the Right Kind of Leverage

Not every entrepreneur needs the same resources, and not every franchise system creates value in the same ways. The goal isn’t to find the biggest system. It’s to understand which advantages matter to you and whether a particular franchise actually delivers them.

If you’re exploring business ownership but unsure what fits, let’s talk. A Franchise Fit Conversation can help you evaluate not just the business itself, but the systems, resources and economic leverage behind it.

Frequently Asked Questions